http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/91496In the article, Spike Lee accuses Clint Eastwood of being biased against blacks because he didn't feature black soldiers in either of his WWII movies. IMO, Spike Lee's sentiment is a perfect example of how PCness in Hollywood can be taken to nauseating heights.
I mean, dude, this is WORLD WAR II!!!! The military did not become racially integrated until the Korean War five years later. Black soldiers, to my knowledge, were not in the front lines of Iwo Jima because the Marine Corps was almost all-white. Is this racist? You're damn right it is. But guess what? Clint Eastwood addresses the issue of racism in BOTH of his movies. Flag of our Fathers deals with how a Native American marine was trivialized just because of his race and Letters showed the racial animosity between both Japanese and American soldiers. But why must all movies address race issues anyways? If the movie was a Vietnam movie, I think Lee would have a case that blacks aren't being treated fairly, but it's not! If we force film makers to constantly ensure their movies are PC, the sincerity of the message is going to be highly questioned. It's going to be just like product placement- something that is put in for purely financial reasons, in this case, protection against the feared race card.
What does Spike want Clint Eastwood to do? Make sure EVERYONE is represented? Oh blacks served but aren't represented, let's have a token black officer so we make sure they are represented. Oh Jews served but aren't represented, let's make sure we make the sergeant be Jewish so they are represented. Oh the Japanese-Americans who served as interpreters served but aren't represented, let's make sure we have at least half an hour of film dedicated to these guys. Oh women aren't represented but they served, let's make sure we get a couple of scenes with the signature hot nurse who gives the soldiers flash backs of home. And you can go on, and on, and on...
Gawd.
Chatboard (0)